When it comes to competitive gaming, every millisecond counts. Gamers seek monitors that provide fast response times to ensure smooth visuals and minimal input lag. Two popular choices in the high-end gaming monitor market are the LG 38GN950 and the ASUS ROG Swift PG35VQ. This article compares their response times to help gamers make an informed decision.

Understanding Response Times in Gaming Monitors

Response time refers to the time it takes for a pixel to change from one color to another, typically measured in milliseconds (ms). A lower response time results in less motion blur and ghosting, which are critical factors during fast-paced gameplay. Monitors with response times below 5ms are generally preferred for competitive gaming.

LG 38GN950 Response Time Analysis

The LG 38GN950 features a Nano IPS panel with a rated response time of 1ms. This rapid response is achieved through overdrive technology, which pushes pixels to change states faster. In real-world tests, the monitor demonstrates excellent performance with minimal ghosting, making it suitable for fast action games like first-person shooters and racing titles.

ASUS ROG Swift PG35VQ Response Time Analysis

The ASUS ROG Swift PG35VQ boasts a VA panel with a rated response time of approximately 2ms. While slightly slower than the LG, it still offers impressively quick pixel transitions. The monitor's advanced overdrive settings further enhance response times, reducing motion artifacts during intense gaming sessions.

Comparison of Response Times

  • LG 38GN950: 1ms (rated), excellent real-world performance
  • ASUS PG35VQ: 2ms (rated), very good in practice

Both monitors deliver response times suitable for competitive gaming. The LG 38GN950 has a slight edge with its faster rated response time, which translates into even smoother visuals during rapid movements. However, the ASUS PG35VQ's performance remains highly competitive and is sufficient for most gamers seeking high responsiveness.

Additional Factors Influencing Gaming Performance

While response time is crucial, other features also impact gaming experience:

  • Refresh Rate: The LG 38GN950 offers a 144Hz refresh rate, while the ASUS PG35VQ features a 200Hz rate, providing even smoother motion.
  • G-Sync and FreeSync: Both monitors support adaptive sync technologies to eliminate screen tearing.
  • Input Lag: Both models have low input lag, essential for real-time responsiveness.

Conclusion

In summary, both the LG 38GN950 and ASUS ROG Swift PG35VQ excel in response times, making them excellent choices for gamers prioritizing speed and visual clarity. The LG's 1ms response time provides a slight advantage for the most demanding fast-paced games, but the ASUS's higher refresh rate and overall features also make it a compelling option. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific gaming needs and preferences.