Table of Contents
Choosing the right microphone is essential for live performances, broadcasting, and recording. Two popular options are the Electro-Voice RE320 and the Sennheiser E935. Both microphones are designed to deliver clear sound, but they differ significantly in their off-axis rejection capabilities. This article compares these two microphones to determine which has superior off-axis rejection.
Understanding Off-Axis Rejection
Off-axis rejection refers to a microphone’s ability to minimize sound pickup from sources that are not directly in front of it. High off-axis rejection is crucial in noisy environments or when multiple sound sources are present, as it helps isolate the desired sound and reduce background noise.
Electro-Voice RE320 Overview
The Electro-Voice RE320 is a dynamic cardioid microphone renowned for its versatility and durability. It features a variable-D design that minimizes proximity effect and provides consistent off-axis rejection. Its internal shock mount reduces handling noise, making it a popular choice for broadcast and live sound applications.
Key Features of the RE320
- Variable-D technology for minimal proximity effect
- Cardioid polar pattern for focused pickup
- Built-in humbucking coil to reduce electromagnetic interference
- Internal shock mount for reduced handling noise
The RE320’s design emphasizes off-axis rejection, making it effective at rejecting sounds from the sides and rear, especially in challenging acoustic environments.
Sennheiser E935 Overview
The Sennheiser E935 is a handheld dynamic cardioid microphone favored by vocalists and sound engineers. It boasts a super-cardioid polar pattern, which provides excellent off-axis rejection, especially from the sides. Its robust construction is built for stage use and demanding environments.
Key Features of the E935
- Super-cardioid polar pattern for superior off-axis rejection
- High maximum sound pressure level (SPL)
- Rugged construction for durability
- Clear, natural sound reproduction
The E935’s super-cardioid pattern offers tighter off-axis rejection compared to standard cardioids, making it highly effective at isolating vocals from ambient noise and stage bleed.
Comparison of Off-Axis Rejection
Both microphones excel in rejecting off-axis sounds, but their designs influence their effectiveness in different scenarios. The RE320’s variable-D technology provides consistent rejection across a wide frequency range and minimizes proximity effect, making it suitable for various applications. The E935’s super-cardioid pattern offers sharper rejection from the sides, ideal for stage performances with high ambient noise.
Performance in Noisy Environments
In environments with significant background noise, the E935’s super-cardioid pattern tends to perform better due to its narrower pickup angle. The RE320 also offers good rejection but may pick up slightly more ambient sound due to its broader cardioid pattern.
Handling and Durability
The RE320’s internal shock mount and robust build make it well-suited for handling rough conditions. The E935’s durable construction is designed to withstand stage abuse, but it is primarily intended for handheld use.
Conclusion: Which Microphone Has Superior Off-Axis Rejection?
When evaluating off-axis rejection, the Sennheiser E935’s super-cardioid pattern provides a slight edge in rejecting sounds from the sides, especially in loud, stage environments. The Electro-Voice RE320 offers excellent rejection with the added benefit of consistent performance across a broader frequency range and less proximity effect. The choice depends on the specific application: for stage vocals and loud environments, the E935 may be preferable; for versatile broadcasting and recording, the RE320 is a strong contender.