Electro-voice Re320 vs. Audio-technica Bp40: Which Is Better for Broadcast?

Choosing the right microphone is essential for broadcast professionals. The Electro-Voice RE320 and the Audio-Technica BP40 are two popular options, each with unique features. This article compares these microphones to help you decide which is better for your broadcasting needs.

Overview of the Electro-Voice RE320

The Electro-Voice RE320 is a dynamic cardioid microphone designed for professional broadcasting and studio recording. It is renowned for its versatility and durability, making it a favorite among radio hosts and podcasters.

Key features include:

  • Variable-D technology for minimal proximity effect
  • Wide frequency response (50 Hz – 16 kHz)
  • Built-in humbucking coil to reduce electromagnetic interference
  • Rugged construction suitable for live environments

Overview of the Audio-Technica BP40

The Audio-Technica BP40 is a large-diaphragm dynamic microphone optimized for broadcast and podcasting. It offers a rich, natural sound and excellent off-axis rejection, making it ideal for studio environments.

Key features include:

  • Large-diaphragm capsule for detailed sound capture
  • Cardioid polar pattern for focused pickup
  • Frequency response of 30 Hz – 18 kHz
  • Built-in shock mount for reducing handling noise

Sound Quality Comparison

The RE320 offers a clear, natural sound with a slight emphasis on midrange frequencies, making voices sound warm and present. Its variable-D technology minimizes proximity effect, providing consistent tone regardless of distance.

The BP40 provides a rich, full-bodied sound with excellent detail and a smooth frequency response. Its large diaphragm captures nuances in voice, making it suitable for high-quality broadcast recordings.

Durability and Build Quality

The RE320 is built with rugged materials, designed to withstand the rigors of live broadcasting. Its humbucking coil reduces electromagnetic interference, ensuring reliable performance.

The BP40 features a sturdy construction with a shock-mounted capsule, reducing handling noise and ensuring durability in studio settings.

Ease of Use and Versatility

Both microphones are user-friendly, but the RE320’s wide frequency response and variable-D technology make it versatile for various broadcast scenarios.

The BP40’s large diaphragm and cardioid pattern make it particularly suitable for voice-focused applications, with straightforward operation for studio use.

Price and Value

The RE320 is generally more affordable, offering excellent value for its features and durability. It is a cost-effective choice for broadcasters seeking quality and reliability.

The BP40 tends to be priced higher but justifies its cost with superior sound quality and build, making it a worthwhile investment for professional studios.

Conclusion: Which Is Better for Broadcast?

Both microphones are excellent choices for broadcast applications. The Electro-Voice RE320 is ideal for those seeking a durable, versatile microphone with natural sound. The Audio-Technica BP40 is better suited for broadcasters prioritizing rich, detailed voice capture in a studio environment.

Ultimately, the decision depends on your specific needs, budget, and environment. For general broadcasting with a focus on durability and versatility, the RE320 is recommended. For high-fidelity studio recordings, the BP40 offers superior sound quality.