Best For Swimming: Polar Verity Sense Vs Wahoo Hrm For Water Sports

Choosing the right heart rate monitor is essential for swimmers and water sports enthusiasts. Two popular options are the Polar Verity Sense and the Wahoo Hrm. Both devices offer features tailored for water-based activities, but they have distinct differences that can influence your choice.

Overview of Polar Verity Sense

The Polar Verity Sense is a versatile heart rate sensor designed for various sports, including swimming. It is a lightweight, comfortable, and waterproof device that can be worn on the arm or other parts of the body. Its primary features include accurate heart rate tracking, Bluetooth and ANT+ connectivity, and compatibility with multiple fitness apps.

Overview of Wahoo Hrm

The Wahoo Hrm is a popular heart rate strap known for its reliability and ease of use. It is a chest strap device that transmits data via Bluetooth and ANT+. While it is not specifically designed for swimming, some users have used it in water with certain precautions. Its main advantages include long battery life, robust build, and consistent heart rate data.

Waterproof Capabilities and Suitability for Swimming

The Polar Verity Sense is fully waterproof and specifically designed for swimming. It can be submerged up to 50 meters, making it suitable for pool and open water swimming. Its optical sensor provides continuous heart rate monitoring underwater without the need for a chest strap.

In contrast, the Wahoo Hrm is primarily a chest strap that is water-resistant but not fully waterproof. Its waterproof rating is generally IPX7, meaning it can handle splashes and brief immersion but is not recommended for prolonged swimming or deep water activities. Some swimmers have used it in water, but it may require additional protective measures.

Accuracy and Performance Underwater

The Polar Verity Sense’s optical sensor provides accurate heart rate readings during swimming, thanks to its waterproof design and specialized sensors. Users report reliable data during both pool and open water swims.

The Wahoo Hrm, being a chest strap, can also provide accurate heart rate data during water activities if it remains in contact with the skin. However, since it is not fully waterproof, its performance may degrade over time or with prolonged submersion. Proper maintenance and cautious use are advised.

Battery Life and Connectivity

The Polar Verity Sense offers up to 20 hours of battery life, making it suitable for long training sessions. It connects seamlessly via Bluetooth and ANT+ to various devices and apps, providing flexibility for swimmers and athletes.

The Wahoo Hrm typically provides around 12 months of battery life with standard use. Its connectivity options include Bluetooth and ANT+, compatible with most fitness devices and apps, but it lacks the wireless features specific to water sports.

Ease of Use and Comfort

The Polar Verity Sense is lightweight and comfortable, with adjustable straps for a secure fit during swimming. Its optical sensor eliminates the need for a chest strap, enhancing comfort for water sports.

The Wahoo Hrm’s chest strap design may be less comfortable for some users during swimming, especially if the strap shifts or causes chafing. Proper fitting is crucial for accurate data collection.

Price and Value

The Polar Verity Sense is generally priced higher than the Wahoo Hrm, reflecting its advanced waterproof features and versatile design. It offers good value for serious swimmers who need reliable water-based heart rate monitoring.

The Wahoo Hrm is a more affordable option, suitable for athletes who primarily use it for land-based training but want occasional water use. Its durability and long battery life make it a cost-effective choice for many users.

Conclusion

For dedicated swimmers and water sports enthusiasts, the Polar Verity Sense stands out as the better choice due to its full waterproof capability, accurate optical heart rate monitoring underwater, and comfort. The Wahoo Hrm can be suitable for water activities with caution, but it is primarily designed for land-based training. Consider your specific needs, budget, and water activity level when choosing between these two devices.